DoA and warranty replacements are
issues that dealers and partners across the country have now accepted
as part and parcel of the IT business. Either they take them into
their stride and move on or they completely move out of the IT
business altogether. Most of them complain that the vendors are not
defining clear policies on either of the above issues. To add to it,
distributors insist that they can act only in accordance to vendor
policies, which means that the partners are left in a lurch as far as
finding amicable solutions are concerned. There are associations who
often take up cudgel on behalf of their member partners, but in the
face of complete non-cooperation from the vendor side, it's not much
that they can do. While DoA and warranty-related
problems have been troubling partners now for years, The DQ Week
is currently getting a first-hand experience of the situation. We
recently embarked on a joint initiative with COMPASS, the association
from Kolkata, on bringing clarity to the DoA policies of the vendors.
The problems here are multiple-most vendors do not have any clearly
enunciated policies or frameworks on this aspect; so there is no
clarity in communication with the partners. In case of principals
where some sort of framework is in place, there seems to be
particular lack of intent and in some cases brazen indifference and
nonchalance to honor the words of these policies. Take for instance the
current DQ
Week campaign where we decided to examine the vendor DoA policies
in a particular category every week. We started with motherboards and
moved to monitors with plans to embark on notebooks next. However, in
the first week itself biggies like Intel and AMD refused to share any
details despite repeated attempts from our side. Ditto in case of
monitors-there have been no responses from vendors like Samsung, LG
or AOC. Things do not look much rosier next week when notebooks will
be taken up. We have to make do in some cases with sketchy
information available on the vendor websites. And in many cases,
without any information at all. This state of affairs is not just
abysmal, but shocking to say the least and smacks of an entirely
callous attitude from leading vendors and the way they conduct their
businesses here in India. So what should be done to alleviate the
situation and make vendors see a reason behind adopting well-defined
policies and making them clear to the channel partners as well as
honoring them in both words and spirit. For one, the distributors
have an important role to play here. Most partners accuse the
distributors of not undertaking replacement of DoA goods and not
helping them enough to deliver on customer requirements quickly.
Distributors feel that most dealers
are not aware of the correct vendor policies as far as DoA and
warranty replacements are concerned, and therefore find fault with
the distributors. Though they agree that there are no clear-cut
policies on DoA and warranty from the vendor's side, but still aver
that it is the responsibility of the partner to find out and know the
vendor policies. Since distributors also have targets and stocks to
deal with, they feel they cannot keep track of all DoA and warranty
concerns. Distributors believe they only serve as a bridge between
the channel and vendors and cannot be blamed for everything. While this
mutual blame game would
not lead to any concrete results, it is time that some strong actions
are taken. For one, vendors need to be more accountable and should
put right policies in place. And to ensure that this does not remain
only a lip service, even drastic options like 'stop payment'
envisaged by certain partners should not be ruled out if it proves to
be the best option. Perhaps this would make vendors and even
distributors treat the channel as customers and work to find amicable
solutions. And distributors, perhaps instead of totally washing their
hands off the matter, should rather sit with the association and
vendors, and clarify all doubts as regards DoA and warranty. But the
biggest mindset change has to come from vendors; and they should take
this seriously, before it seriously jeopardizes their businesses in
the Indian marketplace.