Vinita Bhatia Mumbai, Nov 23
When Gigabyte announced its plans to bring Asustek Computers
into its fold, there was a flurry of questions. Initially the two companies
announced that a joint venture would be formed to produce Gigabyte branded
motherboards and graphics cards. But this still left a lot of questions
unanswered, especially pertaining to what would happen to Asus' motherboards.
Now a clearer picture has emerged. And that is in the form of
Gigabyte United, a division of Gigabyte International, which will concentrate
entirely on manufacturing mother-boards and cards. While Asus will continue to
function as a separate entity and will still be a competitor for Gigabyte
United.
That is the message Tim Handley, Regional Marketing Manager-Pan
Asia and Pan Africa, Gigabyte United disseminated on his one-day trip to India.
"We don't share our technology with Asus. So, Asus will still be our
competitor," he noted.
"We don't share |
But would it not make more sense to simply assimilate Asus into
the Gigabyte brand? Not according to Handley. Firstly, because Asus has a
different and distinct brand identity. "Also, Gigabyte has technological
agreements with vendors like AMD and Intel. For instance, we are six weeks ahead
for Dual Core motherboards. If we merge with Asus then that relationship will be
lost," Handley clarified.
Working for the favor of Gigabyte is also the fact that the
channel and customers perceive that Gigabyte has taken Asus over. This way, its
position has been strengthened further among the channel community.
Handley also pointed out that Asus has strong relationship with
OEMs and sold largely to them. On the other hand, 80 percent of Gigabyte's
comes from its channel. By keeping the two companies separate, Gigabyte can
ensure that it continues to meet the needs of two distinct set of customers
without losing out to an external competitor like Foxconn.
Interestingly, for the past two years, Foxconn was trying to buy
Gigabyte. "The reason was simple. Like most Taiwanese companies, Foxconn
business model was to simply manufacture motherboards in bulk to enjoy economies
of scale. It did not have any need to market its brand or create its brand
identity," explained Handley.
But China has emerged as the mass producer for the world and
this put Foxconn in a fix. It did not have a channel or go-to-market strategy.
Also, Foxconn has OEM partnerships and does not sell to the end customer.
On the other hand, Gigabyte had a dedicated and loyal channel, a
robust branding strategy and sold to the end-users. Therefore, Foxconn had been
making overtures to take over Gigabyte as the best route to transform itself
into a popular brand. There was not much else that Foxconn could have done to
upgrade itself into an end-customer brand other than this.
"So before Foxconn could take us over, Gigabyte decided to
merge forces with Asustek Inc and consolidate its position. This joining of
forces has made Gigabyte stronger as a company. Also, we can now make cheaper
motherboards, without compromising on the quality," noted Handley.